Corr! Phwoarrr!! Ain't she a beauty? Pass the kleenex, missus!
Now, I don't usually go a bundle on Fenders but there are times when you just have to bow down to a firm that have been slightly averse to deviating from their own tried and tested designs that came to light 50+ years ago. The reason for this is simple; these designs ain't broken, so they don't need fixing. They are basic and workmanlike guitars with a distinctive sound that has helped establish the Fender company as an international household name as well as shaping the sound of contemporary music for the past half-a-decade. Buddy Holly, The Shadows, Eric Clapton and even Stray Photon have been known to use this brand almost exclusively.
Now it's time for the science bit (pay attention). When it comes to electric guitars, players tend to be either Fender or Gibson inclined. There are many reasons for this. I tend to favour "Gibbons" out of the two brands because the latter tends to focus on manufacturing guitars with two humbucking pick-ups and set-in necks. The combination of this part and type of construction go a long way in how the sound is shaped. From this, you'll get a thicker sound with longer sustain, suitable for butch and manly types of music such as punk and heavy metal. Where as with most Fender instruments, they employ single coil pick-ups and bolt on necks, and this gives a thinner and brighter sound which is favoured by girlie bands such as The Smiths, Dire Straits and other soft northern bands like The Housemartins, The Beautiful South and Kingmaker.
But let's enlighten ourselves on the revelation coming forth from the pictures within this post. The guitar in question is a Fender Jaguar Limited Edition HH (the 'HH' stands for 'Humbucker Humbucker'). It has a bolt-on neck unfortunately, which can be troublesome when you bang the palm of your hand on the heel when you're playing those super fast macho metal solos - you wouldn't have that trouble with a set-neck / neck-thru type construction. But apart from that, this is a guitar that actually looks the part in a sturdy and industrial way. Black and chrome, sexy, no messing, it's drop-dead cool. I want one. I may even sell one of my other guitars to fund it. There is also a bass version of this guitar with active pick-ups. I want one of those too. But at the moment they only come in red and black. I'd prefer one in a light natural colour, because all basses look better with a natural wood finish.
There's an awful lot of things that I want but don't really need though, and this is probably one of them. It puts me off having to buy something in this country that costs virtually 50% less in the US of A. Not that I'm a tight bastard, you understand. It's just that I hate being ripped off. The chancellor of the exchequer is to blame for that, they set the rate of import tax. This guitar is a Japanese model but it still costs twice as less in the States. Where is the justice in that? After all, we're only trying to help sustain the noble art of guitar manufacturing.
UPDATE: Due to a few posts by other bloggers that are spreading the word of defunct band The Monochrome Set, I thought I'd post this early picture of the band, taken in 1978. From left to right: Lester Square, John Haney, Charlie Harper, Bid. The Monochrome Set was formed in late 1977. An early demo was recorded with Charlie, but there is no recollection as to whether he played any gigs.
15 comments:
If I could play guitar (I currently only play the air version) I would prob plump for a Gibson Les Paul. And I agree - natural wood basses and pref fretless a la Jaco Pastorius are the real deal as far as I am concerned.
I'd plump for the Telecaster. It's how a guitar should look.
Mmmmmmmmmm, nice.
Just a small problem tho, aren't there too many switches?
I'd be switching things on and off with a misplaced wrist, knuckle, or tongue. They don't ALL work do they? What do they do? We neeeeeeeeeeeeeed to know.
and Geoff, I agree. I am plump, and I have telecaster.
Are you going to get one for Christmas then Ister?
Nice. A rosewood neck, I note...
RoMo - You have good taste in guitars and you should take up the real thing, unless you want to remain in air guitar limbo.
Geoff - But it's not how a guitar should sound.
Howesy - The switches are for aesthetic affect. If I win the jackpot, I'll go and buy one in Noo Yoik and have a holiday at the same time. Stay plump.
Stray - I reeeaaallllyyyyy don't want to get technical here, but it's a maple neck. The fingerboard on the other hand...
"I reeeaaallllyyyyy don't want to get technical here"...
you could've fooled me!
Look...do you rrrreeeaaallllyyyyy want to know what all those switches are for?
Well...
erm...
d'you know,
I think I do.
Billy saw a nice guitar in the Saturday Guardian mag - a Luna Princess child's guitar in aqua. If they do one in an adult size and good quality sound I think it will be on his Xmas list :)
I have a Gibson SG and I love it, not that I can play the bloody thing but it looks damn sexy.
I call her Debbie (Gibson), I think were alone now :-)
Howesy - OK, go back to the picture at the top of the page and have another close look at the layout of the controls, things are about to get a bit complicated.
There are three chrome control panels spread around the body which combine in operation to give the player two distinct circuits which Fender have chosen to call "Rhythm" and "Lead". We need to start with the panel on the upper horn above the bridge pickup. Here we find a single switch and two recessed rollers. When the switch is in the up position this panel is in circuit and all other controls are disabled. This is the Rhythm circuit and engages the neck pickup only. The two recessed rollers control the volume and tone of this pickup.
Flicking the switch down relinquishes control to the other two control panels below the strings. We are now in Lead channel mode. The panel below the neck pickup has three switches; an on/off for the neck pickup, an on/off for the bridge pickup and a tone switch (in practise this is essentially a treble cut switch). The third panel houses the volume and tone for the Lead channel (capped with some very handsome chrome-skirted knobs) and the output jack.
There ya go. Now please go and update your blog. Perhaps you could tell us a little about that 78 Jazz bass you've got?
Llewtrah - Perhaps you should buy Billy this?
http://www.brianeastwoodguitars.co.uk/bluemoon.html
Palace Fan - As the saying goes; "Nothing screams like an SG". I've got an SG Voodoo signed by Leslie West that I'm thinking of off-loading. The neck is chunky but it sounds superb.
Doh!
Ah yes, I thought as much.
So you want some 78jazzbassbased guitar porn eh?
I'll see what I can do.
I'm late to the guitar party post but I feel that, given my guitar-weilding blogging title, I have to comment.
Jags, while they look like the coolest thing since my dragon jump-suit, are the pits to play. Too short a scale, you see. Only a girly 24 inches. It makes for crowded frets and floppy strings. At least this one has a proper Gibson-style tunomatic bridge and tailpiece and should, therefore have a bit of a better break angle over the saddles which means that the poxy, floppy strings don't fall out of the saddle grooves as you crunch into some serious riffage.
They do look cool though. No doubt there. If you're in a low-down mood though, why not get a Bass VI. Nice.
Guitar geekery over (although I think I can get away with it on a page where you explain the intricacies of Fender's Lead/Rhythm circuit). Sorry. I have had some beers, you know.
Howesy - Good lad, you won't regret it. Just think of the emotional release you'll enjoy by putting it up.
JPT - Thanks for your insightful contribution. I was purely fazed by the Jaguar's looks. The body shape, colour scheme and oversized 70's headstock did it for me. I've just been outbid on one that was lurking on eBay. Can't say I'm dissapointed as I managed to buy a beautiful Ibanez in mint condition some time ago.
Jackson has been the new kid on the block ever since the days of hair-metal.
Post a Comment