I recently opened an account with iTunes so that I could purchase some songs that was advertised exclusively as an online album. The advertisement in question showed the iTunes emblem at the bottom of the picture that was displayed on the band's MySpace presence, so like a fool I rushed over to download it from the "Macster Gang" site.
This was where I should've done my research prior to buying. I later found out that on the band's main website, they are also selling this online album through Tunetribe.com. What's the difference, I hear you ask?
Well, apart from it being 50p cheaper, if you buy from Tunetribe you'll download the album in the Windows Media Audio format, whereas iTunes uses the MP4 copy-protected compressed audio file system. My car CD player doesn't do MP4s or even WMA! MP3s are no problem, but why does a company like iTunes insist on solely using the MP4 / M4P format when you are limited to the hardware you can play it on. I don't need an iPod and I'm buggered if I'm going to carry the PSP around to listen to it (that's if it plays back on the PSP). My mobile phone plays MP3 files - it's more of a generic format with sound quality which is as good as MP4 /M4P.
The reason iTunes went for MP4 / M4P is that it's tough to crack the copy protection within the file itself. So, we're dealing with anti-piracy imposed restrictions here, because at-the end-of-the-day-when-it-gets-dark, every hard-up composer must get paid for his / her songwriting efforts.
Bollocks.
Record companies, of whatever form, are primarily businesses looking after their own interests and not (as is often believed) after the artist. True, you're not going to get one without the other, but by implementing certain anti-piracy controls within the realm of digital / electronic playback, it's quite clear that this is a form of padlocking up the stock after the goods have been sold. Also, it does a lot of good for iPod sales.
There are ways and means in place to get around the copy protected M4P system. But the software available isn't as trustworthy as some people seem to be deluded that it is, ie; it works for certain versions of iTunes but not for others. You can always hook a wire up to a minidisc recorder, but you'll still get a further reduction in playback quality.
iTunes do not want their goods pirated, but the program itself allows you to rip the contents of a CD into the iTunes player and can be transferred to an iPod. Strange that - I could've sworn ripping CDs was an illegal process.
iTunes should give you a choice of downloadable formats, after all this in itself is not a new idea - there are online music stores that will even allow you to download the far superior WAV format file (true CD quality) if you choose to, sometimes for the same price as an MP3, if not a little extra.
10 comments:
I think there may be a change looming Istster, I read somewhere that Apple and some of the other biog players (EMI, I think) are looking at ditching the copy protection thing altogether and may have been persuaded that it's in own their interests to make music as easy as possible to download legally.
Why?
Because copy protection patently hasn't worked. All you need to do is copy an apple file to CD, import it as an MP3 and then you can distribute it to anyone, anywhere....So make it easier to buy the stuff and you at least get some cash out of it before it gets distributed free anyway.
We'll see. It may take a few years - probably after they've done the Beatles back-catalogue download thing and squeezed even nmore money out of songs recorded over 40 years ago. But it will probably happen eventually.
L.U.V. on ya,
Bob
Buy the vinyl, listen to the songs at home, and hum it to yourself in the car. Or, you could hire the band for the journey to work and they could play in the back of your motor, christ knows it's big enuff!
Yeah that whole mp4 thing really PISSES me off! Howeser - have you ever attempted to perform in a Smart car? I meant the band playing obviously not anything else. Oh - you know what I mean!
"Howeser - have you ever attempted to perform in a Smart car?"
RoMo, that's for me to know and for the FBI to find out.
Ister...just a quick (or not) line to say that I have decided to remove myself from the internet and all the shite that goes along with it!
It's a peace of mind thing, I no longer am willing to waste my time and life trying to sort problems of the internet out...that is a PROBLEM in itself..
Back to the simple life for me, I'll explain further when I next see you.
I still don't have iTunes or an i-wotsit. I have a problem with the fact that there is no negotiated choice anymore. I would just be overcome by all of the choice. It's just too much for me. Part of the joy of music for me is to be able to save up a tenner and feel the artefact in my hands (I meant the vinyl or the CD before you make a rude jokester). For me, it's the waiting and the moment where you finally get it. It's kind of nice. I just wait for friends to send me music now. I like the podcasts too. I get to know new stuff through that....so I bought The Pipettes after listening to Bobsters Podsters. And I might buy Panda thingy because I just heard it on someone's blog. They just sound like the Beach Boys. I don't really need to buy anything anymore due to Bob, Ro-Mo's, Billy's and your podcasts. I really like that part of it.
It's instant gratification.
God, what am I going on about...babble.
I'll shurrup.
I'm not even talking about MP3s or 4s because I don't even know the difference to be honest. I still go to work on a horse and cart and got my nether regions stuck in a mangle the other day. I know, I know....I still eat Wagon Wheels too.
Can you send a message to JDA as well that I'm sorry he's gone. That's a shame. I enjoyed downloading those last two songs of his.
Bob - I've tried burning to disc and then ripping them back to iTunes as MP3, I've read about that one, but it doesn't seem to work. Perhaps it's because I've got a new version of iTunes player?!? The points you've made are valid. I'm fine with buying CD's and DVD's wether they are copy protected or not, just let me play them on any type of 'universal' machine, if you see what I'm on about.
Howesy - I...err, umm...ahhh...why do you think this way at your ripe old age?
RoMo - Never try and dig your own grave with Howesy around.
Molls - The beauty of podcasts, eh? I'd have my own pods up for distribution on iTunes, but the feckers rejected my submissions. Just goes to show what good taste they have.
Oh, and that isn't the real reason for me having a go at iTunes, honest Guv!
until my return...
http://jda-gonebutnotforgood.blogspot.com/
vinyl has nice big pictures which puts less strain on the old minces, I like the way the light reflects of the black parts and it's traditional and trendy to say you like vinyl over other formats. Truth be told, I like CDs too, plus I make good use of my mp3 player (especially the 72 goon shows, 24 navy larks, and the Derek and Clive that's on it). It seems to support so many formats and I've had no touble with it at all, which is rare for me and technology.
"ripe old age"... at least it's ripe...
I've re-ripped discs written from iTunes. The degradation in quality doesn't matter if you're listening on a personal mp3 player or a noisy train or mp3 player in the car surrounded by traffic noise.
My home is littered with mp3/wma players - on PCs, portables, personals, in-car - and I want my music to be portable, hence my avoidance of iTunes.
Post a Comment